Don’t Be Fooled into an argument about which crown we should be using!
The British Monarchy uses several crowns, depending on the occasion and the whim of the Monarch.
So, let’s make this very clear from the outset. All the arguments about which is the correct crown are a waste of time. The crown is irrelevant. It doesn’t signify anything more than a piece of very flashy jewelry.
We need to understand that the crown used on official documents depends on the Royal Warrant issued.
The reason the arguments in Australia are a waste of time is that no Royal Warrant has been issued to use any royal crown ever since Whitlam took the Queen out of the Constitution in 1973.
While people argue over the right crown to use, or even the correct flag colour, they are missing the point. We do not have a lawfully constituted government. It’s that simple. So, the political party corporate government and anyone else, including the people, can use any crown or flag we wish, because none of them have any more meaning than using a kitchen spoon! Crowns are merely impressive looking pieces of jewelry.

The Imperial Crown is very heavy. Queen Elizabeth only wears it on very special occasions. But she prefers to wear lighter crowns on other occasions.
So, where does the spiritual power come from?
What does a Knight put before him as he rides into battle?
It is, of course, the Shield. He uses the shield to protect him.
When you look at any “official” coat of arms it is flanked by two animals. The British use the Lion and the Unicorn. The fake political party corporate government uses the Kangaroo and Emu. These animals hold up the Shield, because the shield is where the power is.

For your information
If you are interested in learning more about the crowns the Royal Family use, this website provides valuable insight.
https://the-crown.fandom.com/wiki/The_Queen%27s_Crowns_and_Tiaras
3 thoughts on “Which Crown is right?”
“So, where does the spiritual power come from?”
Different angle: In EII coronation, she made a covenant with the “Almighty” to uphold the Divine Laws and the Word of the Gospel.
“Deuteronomy Chapter 4.2. Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD(why DOG-LATIN? Genesis Chapter 2.3. and then 2.4.) your God which I command you.”
If lizzie assents to new laws (statutory legislation), is it fair to say that lizzie has broken her covenant with the “Almighty” by adding and or diminishing to the original fundamental Laws, Word, Sound?
https://jforjustice.net/
What is the point of posting here, when we know that said post will not be contested, answered or argued with? Lets start with QE11 wearing the St. Edwards ( Catholic) Crown at her Coronation, or the 3 times she pledged to uphold the Catholic faith during Her Coronation. ( No wonder she didn’t want it filmed.) TREASON. I could go on, but unless there is a discussion on this, there is no point, but facts are facts …
What’s your point? Instead of being so negative how about trying to DO something to fix the problem?