A committee of 25 Barons petitioned the Queen to invoke article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 on March 23rd, 2001 in protest of the treasonous act of the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair in signing the Treaty of Nice, thus unlawfully causing the destruction of fundamental British liberties?.
This was reported in the Daily Telegraph on the 24th March 2001 (page has since been removed — See article this is copied from) and, which is also evidenced by researching the letters available on the internet between Robin Janvrin and the Committee of the Barons at the time, which means that I, along with all peoples of this realm have a lawful duty under common law/constitutional law, to stand by the invocation of said Article 61 and, whilst remaining a lawful and loyal sovereign man, I take full responsibility for my actions and, I hereby notify you of my standing to avoid any confrontation whatsoever, to inform you of the fact that you also have the same duty to serve and protect the constitution according to your Oath, and to stand by the said Article 61 yourself.
Whereas I am a peaceful man and, that I seek to conduct my duties lawfully and honourably, albeit in normal circumstances I would hereby serve you with my ‘notice of lawful objection’ and request from you any objections you may have to my common law rights to stand in ‘lawful rebellion’. However, the directions and guidance given it is assumed no response would be forthcoming. Whereas you have a ‘duty of care’ to protect and to serve the peoples, according to constitutional law, under a constitutional monarchy, which has been usurped by criminals in public office for over 40 years. I urge you to investigate this criminality as a matter of urgency anyway, under law.
The Nice treaty is still today being attempted to be ratified by treasonous public offices and by doing so it will destroy the constitutional laws of the entire realm of Great Britain and the commonwealth. This is an act of treason at common law and must NOT be allowed to occur. The Nice treaty was the grievance that the committee of the barons were referring to with the petition to the office of sovereign on the 7th February 2001.
You would normally be required to respond to this Notice of lawful objection within Seven (7) days from your receipt of this document. AND, If however there is no reply in ‘substance’ or otherwise to this ‘Notice of lawful objection’ then it would have been taken to mean that you (nor any other interested parties) have no objections whatsoever to my lawful standing and, that I will not come into conflict with ANYONE from Police Constables through the Supreme Court, nor will they make ANY demands on me unless they comply with Common law. Common law is ‘of’ the laws of God (commandments) and constitutional law.
Any reply to this ‘Notice of lawful Objection’ would normally be made on your full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and, hopefully you will have responded to in substance with regard to the very serious matter raised herein.
However, I may completely off course with how I believe the law to stand today, and therefore Your Honourable Supreme Court, I ask, please if you would be so kind to provide the law together with any and all factual evidence to show that:
this is not the case, that Article 61 is not the law, and that the Barons committee are not the highest authority in the land and that the Barons committee do not indeed have to publicy announce that they have received redress for the grievance for which A61 MC 1215 was petition upon the Monarch. UNTIL REDRESS IS RECEIVED.
Sincerely, and without ill will, vexation or frivolity, and, on my full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. With no admission of liability whatsoever and, with all my natural, unalienable common law rights reserved.
Marc Chamberlain.
(signed)
Obviously it is my duty under the law which is A61 MC 1215 to compel you and all at the Supreme Court to also stand under law and inform you of the evidence herein.. We look forward to welcoming you to stand with the whole realm, the Barons committee, under the law TODAY, A.61 MC 1215 LAWFULLY INVOKED. God bless.
Yours faithfully,
M Chamberlain
What is Lawful Rebellion?
The Magna Carta is referred to as the Great Charter of Liberties.
The Magna Carta defines certain God-given and inalienable rights. This is what the Barons and King John signed, binding all men and women of the real to ever since and forever:
Since for God, for the improvement of our kingdom, and to better allay the discord arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, and wishing that the concessions be enjoyed in their entirety with firm endurance (for ever), we give and grant to the barons the following security:
Namely, that the barons choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom they wish, who must with all their might observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter. Then, if we, our chief justiciar, our bailiffs or any of our officials, offend in any respect against any man, or break any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is notified to four of the said twenty-five barons, the four shall come to us—or to our chief justicicar if we are absent from the kingdom—to declare the transgression and petition that we make amends without delay.
And if we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, have not corrected the transgression within forty days, reckoned from the day on which the offence was declared to us (or to the chief justice if we are out of the realm), the four barons mentioned before shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons. Together with the community of the whole land, they shall then distrain and distress us in every way possible, namely by seizing castles, lands, possessions and in any other they can (saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children), until redress has been obtain in their opinion. And when amends have been made, they shall obey us as before.
Whoever in the country wants to, may take an oath to obey the orders of the twenty-five barons for the execution of all the previously mentioned matters and, with the barons, to distress us to the utmost of his power. We publicly and freely give permission to every one who wishes to take this oath, and we shall never forbid any one from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling to this oath, we shall by our command compel them to swear to it.
If any one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is in any other manner incapacitated so the previously mentioned provisions cannot be undertaken, the remaining barons of the twenty-five shall choose another in his place as they think fit, who shall be duly sworn in like the rest.
If there is any disagreement amongst the twenty-five barons on any matter presented to them, or if some of them are unwilling or unable to be present, what the majority of those present ordain or command shall be held as fixed and established, exactly as if all twenty-five had consented in this.
The said twenty-five barons shall swear to faithfully observe all the aforesaid articles and will do all they can to ensure that the articles are observed by others.
And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else.
This means that every man and woman within the Realm of the British Crown, including the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and other members of the Commonwealth still bound to HM Queen Elizabeth II, Defender of the Faith is bound by their duty to lawfully rebel.
How can you lawfully rebel?
Lawful Rebellion is defined as any peaceful and lawful act designed to undermine and weaken the existing dictatorial government system.
You may do anything within your power and within the law to defy and undermine the rogue government that is no longer serving the Will of the People.
Lawful Rebellious actions you can take include, but are not limited to:
- Writing to your Parliamentary Representative to tell him/her that is My Will that they take certain actions to improve the lives of those they represent. Of course, they ignore these demands, but if we continue to bombard them with our concerns and demands it puts a lot of stress on them, and may even force them to stop any corruption. Knowing they are being watched will deter their attempts at corruption.
- Impeding unlawful demands by any government departments or enforcers. For example, RBT is unlawful, as Common Law guarantees all men and women the right to travel and move around in their private lives unmolested and unimpeded by the police, unless the police have proof you have committed a crime.
- Refusing to pay fines levied by any unlawful government agency.
- Refusing to pay road tolls. All Australian drivers already pay for the roads when they register a car. Therefore, no government department or agency may tax you for traveling on your roads.
- Refusing to conform to the edicts and community pressure governments use to force people to submit to their dictates. For example, turning off your TV and thinking for yourself is a form of lawful rebellion.
- Refusing to take part in modern pop culture, which is a Marxist construct designed to subjugate you, and stop you thinking.
- Buying and eating only healthy foods, and refusing to buy processed foods that contain chemicals designed to dull your senses or even destroy your health.
Get creative. There are plenty of other ways you can help undermine and destroy the corrupt dictatorship.
11 thoughts on “An Official Declaration of Lawful Rebellion”
“Namely, that the barons”
barons, the entitled, the titled from ?.
the peasants, the “subjects”, the unentitled, from ?
whom protects the peasants from the barons? the defender of the faith or ?.
Damo, you have to comprehend the political realities of the times. You are trying to judge history from your modern viewpoint. The Barons were the ones fighting for freedoms that were enshrined in the Magna Carta…freedoms you enjoy today. Those that do not comprehend the lessons of history are doomed to repeat the same mistakes. Try and study and comprehend history and you might begin to understand what happened then and how it has impacted on us today.
“The Barons were the ones fighting for freedoms that were enshrined in the Magna Carta…freedoms you enjoy today. Those that do not comprehend the lessons of history are doomed to repeat the same mistakes. Try and study and comprehend history and you might begin to understand what happened then and how it has impacted on us today.”
Well, tell me all about it Mike.
The nature, cause, purpose and intent of ” baron, Baron or ‘BARON'”. I am a bit of an aficionado of history and etymology, but lack expect opinion such as your self.
As you are surely aware, principles start at the beginning or begin at the start.
” baron (n.)
c. 1200, “a member of the nobility,” also a low rank in the peerage, from Old French baron (nominative ber) “baron, nobleman, military leader, warrior, virtuous man, lord, husband,” probably from or related to Late Latin baro “man” (source of Spanish varon, Italian barone), which is of uncertain origin. It is perhaps from Celtic or from Frankish *baro “freeman, man” or another Germanic source. In England the word merged with (probably) cognate Old English beorn “nobleman.” ”
“probably from
of uncertain origin
It is perhaps from
the word merged with (probably)”
Mmmmm, appears from the above, some one is not certain, but you Mike are, tell me all about it Mike, your historical facts, the creation of “Titles” and the pyramidal structure of authority, and how the common folk are subjugated by divine right(luck). And while your at it, give me your expert judgement of the definition of “citizen”, cause i dont recall anyone offering that agreement, covenant, contract to me to become a member of the roman curia system, unless of course Mike you have the facts that prove that we have abandoned our will? See, i dont understand why people even talk about a democratic system when we are subjects of a Monarchy system.
Respectfully.
“The Barons were the ones fighting for freedoms that were enshrined in the Magna Carta…freedoms you enjoy today.”
“Magna Carta, English Great Charter, charter of English liberties granted by King John on June 15, 1215, under threat of civil war and reissued with alterations in 1216, 1217, and 1225. By declaring the sovereign to be subject to the rule of law and documenting the liberties held by “free men,” the Magna Carta would provide the foundation for individual rights in Anglo-American jurisprudence.”
I wasn’t there Mike, but i getting an impression that if Johnie boy did not sign the agreement, covenant, contract, pact with the Barons, Johnie boys’ head was most probably going to be separated from Johnie boys’ neck.
Q. Mike, i force you into an agreement, covenant, contract, pact under threat of punishment (torture?) and or forfeiture ( first born? primae noctis? pound of flesh and blood? your existence?, have not decided yet), because my Family have divine luck to rule my Families Realm, what is your mind set?
Does it matter? It’s done and dusted. I’m sorry, but I don’t have time to discuss “what-if’s”
It appears this disagreement is about wording used in the writing or maybe not maybe a belief in the creator God – a higher law. Ok then moving on, each individual person chooses their behaviour throughout their life to comply with unjust laws made by man or not comply – believing in a greater law as set by God, Yahweh and Yeshua and the principles of common law – do no harm and take responsibility for ones actions. So what then is our responsibility to oppose unjust laws – maybe the real question. I would suggest the answer is found in each good mans spirit when and if to act, what are you prepared to die for?
I oppose the deliberate undermining of the Australian constitution for the purpose of enslavement of the Australian people to a godless tyranny.
As do I! ????????
It’s time to stand together and STOP THE ROT AUSTRALIA hold all these lying cheating thieving career politicians criminal accountable for their actions
Great work.
William Arnold Director of Corporate Services
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Parliament Square
London SW1P 3BD
…..HOWS THAT…… MR ARNOLD is director of CORPORATE SERVICES …….what hope have you got ….