Know the Law and you can protect your rights!
If you haven’t read the Digital ID Bill yet, you should. As usual, the government is lying to us. Any time a government employee tells you that you must register for a Digital ID, point them to Section 74, which states:
DIGITAL ID ACT 2024 (NO. 25, 2024) – SECT 74
Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary
Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary
(1) A participating relying party must not, as a condition of providing a service or access to a service, require an individual to create or use a digital ID.
Note: The effect of this subsection is that a participating relying party that provides a service, or access to a service, must provide another means of accessing that service that does not involve the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System.
https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/dia202487/s74.html
Don’t be fooled!
No government employee has any right to demand you comply with their demand for a Digital ID.
If you are confronted by a private business demanding you log in with a Digital ID, tell them to look up the Act and read Section 74. If they continue to insist that you cannot avail yourself of their service without one make sure you get all their details and file a criminal charge against them for contravening the Constitution S 51(xxiiiA), the Digital ID Act 2024 S 74, and for attempting to pervert the course of justice. Any competent lawyer would love to take this on as a No Win No Fee case.
If we do not fight this dreadful Communist idea we will end up like China. Is that what you want?
The full Section 74
DIGITAL ID ACT 2024 (NO. 25, 2024) – SECT 74
Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary
Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary
Note: The effect of this subsection is that a participating relying party that provides a service, or access to a service, must provide another means of accessing that service that does not involve the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System.
(1A) A participating relying party is taken to contravene subsection (1) if:
(b) either of the following apply:
(i) the other means is not reasonably accessible;
(ii) using the other means results in the service being provided on substantially less favourable terms.
Exceptions
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a service of a participating relying party if:
(a) the service provides access to another service; and
(b) the individual can access the other service by means other than the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System; and
(c) the other means is reasonably accessible; and
(d) using the other means does not result in the other service being provided on substantially less favourable terms.
Example: To open a bank account, ABC Bank requires new customers to verify their identity. ABC Bank allows customers to do this in person at each branch of ABC Bank or alternatively by using the bank’s online application service, which requires the use of a digital ID. Jacob wants to open a bank account with ABC Bank but he does not wish to use his digital ID to do so. Because Jacob can verify his identity by going to his nearest branch instead, ABC Bank does not contravene subsection (1).
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) the participating relying party is providing a service, or access to a service, to an individual who is acting on behalf of another entity in a professional or business capacity; or
(b) the participating relying party holds an exemption under subsection (4).
Exemptions
(4) Subject to subsection (6), the Digital ID Regulator may, on application by a participating relying party, grant an exemption under this subsection to the participating relying party if the Digital ID Regulator is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
Note: See Part 5 of Chapter 9 for matters relating to applications.
(4A) In deciding whether to grant an exemption under subsection (4), the Digital ID Regulator must have regard to whether granting the exemption in relation to the participating relying party’s service would unduly undermine access to services of that kind.
(5) Without limiting subsection (4), the Digital ID Regulator may be satisfied that it is appropriate to grant an exemption if:
(a) the participating relying party is a small business (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988 ); or
(b) the participating relying party provides services, or access to services, solely online; or
(c) the participating relying party is providing services, or access to services, in exceptional circumstances.
(6) However, the Digital ID Regulator must not grant an exemption under subsection (4) to a participating relying party that is:
(a) a Commonwealth entity, or a Commonwealth company, within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 ; or
(b) a person or body that is an agency within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 ; or
(c) a body specified, or the person holding an office specified, in Part I of Schedule 2 to the Freedom of Information Act 1982 .
(7) An exemption under subsection (4):
(a) must be in writing; and
(b) may be revoked by the Digital ID Regulator if the Digital ID Regulator considers it appropriate to do so.
(8) The Digital ID Regulator must:
(a) give written notice of a decision to grant, or to refuse to grant, the exemption to the participating relying party; and
(b) if the decision is to refuse to grant the exemption–give reasons for the decision to the participating relying party.
How it Works – Click here to watch the video:
https://cirnow.com.au/videos/repealdigid/repeal-did-finvidplayer_player.html
